> > I have. I am awaiting solaris test details. > > Not very good: regressions on Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 and 9. > > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_allocate_big_per_type.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_delete.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_new.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-3.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-1.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-2.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-3.cc execution test > FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-4.cc execution test
Yes, I saw this with Joe Buck's results yesterday. Further details have not been available. These new fails are annoying, but not release-critical, and seem to be confined to Solaris. I'm not quite sure what is going on: can you send me your libstdc++ log file please? -benjamin
