On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:50:39PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote: > of course, but the behavior of a compiler with a special implementation > dependent switch is not specified by the standard! Switches can do any > amount of violence to the standard you like, the only requirement is > that there be a defined set of switches which gives standard defined > semantics.
Except that the point I've been trying to make for the last day is that -fshort-enums does no damage to the standard. At least for C99. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
