Andrew Pinski wrote: > > FWIW, I think part of the problem is that TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS is not > > set on the constructor, despite the presence of a function call in > > the components.
> No, that is not the problem. The problem is that we gimplify the > expression for side effects but don't actually add the expression if > the gimplify put it back in the same expression. > Any ways, the following patch fixes the issue correctly. > > If you could test and post the patch, that would be nice? Will look into it as a separate change (from the init_ctor that I'm about to submit). Thanks.
