Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > spinlock_t lock = (spinlock_t) { .raw_lock = one_raw_spinlock() };
>
> What exactly is this code expected to do?
> Call one_raw_spinlock and then throw away the result?Yes. As you said, the result is nothing anyway, but the function should still be called IMO. > If so, feel free to change gimplify_init_ctor_eval to do that. Thanks :) Thanks for your feedback. Olivier
