On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> >>Yes, I would definitely encourage a little more analysis. I'm rather
> >>puzzled. We have got very nice testsuites on sparc-solaris and on
> >>*-linux, in general, and those failures certainly are not expected.
> >>
> >>
> >Is the
> >
> >FAIL: abi_check
> >
> >failure expected? Should config/abi/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt be
> >somehow updated?
> >
> >
> Yes, probably we should concentrate on that failure. It's the most
> strange, probably, because Benjamin and Jakub (certainly a Sparc expert)
> updated the sparc-linux baseline around mid of June. Maybe we should
> involve Jakub too in the discussion, at least to confirm that on his
> sparc-linux machines abi_check doesn't fail.
The best would be if Christian could post (bzip2ed) readelf -Ws of
the libstdc++.so that fails the abi_check.
Jakub
