On 7/6/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/6/05, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Christian Joensson wrote: > > > > >limiting this e-mail... I could also rebootstrap 4.0.0 if you think > > >that'd be more useful... let me know what you would like... > > > > > Well, every possible independent check can be useful. Both > > rebootstrapping 4.0.0 with your exact current machine certainly makes > > sense (maybe it's obvious to you but for this kind of work, it suffices > > a simple 'make' and only --enable-languages=c++, will take *a lot* less > > time) and testing 4.0.1 with a machine as similar as possible to the one > > you used at the time for 4.0.0. > > > > Also, of course I would like to see the libstdc++.log bits for the fails. > > so, 4.0.0 c++ only is on the way... and here's the relevant(?) > libstdc++.log bits:
So, 4.0.0 testsuite posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00344.html What would you like me to do now? I could back off binutils to binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 and rebootstrap both 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 RC3 for c++ only... -- Cheers, /ChJ
