Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | | > The issue here is whether if the hardware consistently display a | > semantics, GCC should not allow access to that consistent semantics | > under the name that "the standard says it is undefined behaviour". | > Consider the case of converting a void* to a F*, where F is a function | > type. | | Well the "hardware consistently displaying a semantics" is not so | cut and dried as you think (consider the loop instruction and other | arithmetic on the x86 for instance in the context of generating code | for loops).
Please do remember that this is hardware dependent. If you have problems with x86, it does not mean you have the same witha PPC or a Sparc. -- Gaby
