On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 18:19 +0300, Michael Veksler wrote: > > > > > > "Giovanni Bajo wrote on 29/05/2005 13:54:39: > > > Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Perhaps because GCC developers think that GCC isn't buggy when the > > > processor doesn't do the job for them? (I'm thinking of bug 323.) > > > > > > You are mistaken, we think GCC isn't buggy about 323 because the C/C++ > > standards do not tell us to do better than this. If you have higher > > expectations about floating point and C/C++, you should file a bugreport > > against the C/C++ standards. > > > > If more than 50 people report it, independently, as a bug then it sure is > a bug.
Which is why it's still open! Whoops, you forgot that part didn't you :) The problem with 323 isn't that we don't think it's really a bug, it's that nobody has any plans to implement a fix for it other than "use SSE math or a different arch". --Dan
