> From: Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:02:49AM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote: >> Especially for the purpose of VRP, why wouldn't it be most ideally >> appropriate to define the result of a comparison to be a _Bool, as it's >> constrained to the range of 0:1; and by "usual arithmetic conversion", >> need only typically be promoted to a char rank integer (presuming _Bool >> is not specified to be of greater rank than char) ... > Read my original message. (_Bool)1 + (_Bool)1 is folded to 0. I > needed it to be folded to 2.
- Yes thanks; but my point was that the result of comparison should remain '_Bool' not 'int', and be properly promoted to likely 'char' not 'int'. As for VRP to be most useful it needs to know the minimal precision required.
