James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> I would like to still get hold of the information that used to be present
at
>> that page because they were in fact very useful.
>
> This is what web search engines are for.  Going to yahoo, typing gcc
> visibility, and then clicking on the "cached" link for the first search
> result, I get a copy of the page.
>
http://216.109.117.135/search/cache?p=gcc+visibility&sm=Yahoo%21+Search&toggle=1&ei=UTF-8&u=www.nedprod.com/programs/gccvisibility.html&w=gcc+visibility&d=C31F2BCCE8&icp=1&.intl=us


Ah thank you! It's obvious, but for some reason I tried webarchive.com but
google didn't occur to me! :) I'll put this into the Wiki, and update the
webpage.

(notice: I use the Wiki because otherwise I'll have to wait weeks for the
approval, and I don't have the time nor the willing of pushing a patch for
weeks just for this. I believe we should either be more liberal with the
contents of our website, or get more reviewers. For instance, we could think
of a policy where a www patch can be applied after 48hrs if nobody says
otherwise).
-- 
Giovanni Bajo

Reply via email to