> My personal feeling I think the success of the Wiki is that it does not > require review, rather than the fact that the Wiki syntax is partially > lighter than HTML. The 48-hrs rule I propose seems sensible to me. The worst > thing that can happen is that something incorrect goes live on the site, and > it'll eventually get fixed when someone reads the patch a few days later.
I mentioned this during Wiki discussion, and Gerald pointed out that the "faq-o-matic" we used to have required no approval, and was always out of date anyway. :) --Dan
