On Wednesday 02 March 2005 03:36, Andrew Pinski wrote: > I don't know why I replied to this thread but I did. Well I think we > should have > no more on this thread unless it is about technical reasons why GPC > cannot be > included, or political (FSF/SC decides it is not a good thing).
GCC source tree bloat is a technical reason. And a valid one AFAIC. I wish Jim luck with bringing GPC to a state where it *could* be included. But if almost nobody is interested in having it in the FSF tree, then it should not be included. Martin's point that there is not a single application anyone cares of that you need GPC for is also a valid reason, btw. Gr. Steven
