On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:04:42PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: > >> It is similar to libsanitizer. Put it in glibc isn't going to work well > >> for MPX. > > > > Can you explain it more please? > > > > Are you suggesting putting MPX run-time in glibc? Will we have > 2 glibc, one with MPX run-time and one without MPX run-time?
No, I just think signal chaining should be in glibc. Then there would be no conflicts, and the problem Joseph pointed out with unconditionally taking away sigaction from the user program also wouldn't happen. -Andi
