> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 09 May 2014 12:07 > To: Andrew Bennett > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Matthew Fortune; Saeed Ghazanfar; Rich Fuhler > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS r3 and r5 > > Andrew Bennett <andrew.benn...@imgtec.com> writes: > >> > @@ -141,7 +151,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see > >> > "%{EL:-m elf32lmip} \ > >> > %{EB:-m elf32bmip} \ > >> > %(endian_spec) \ > >> > - %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2} > >> %{mips64} \ > >> > + %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2} > >> \ > >> > + %{mips32r3} %{mips32r5} %{mips64} \ > >> > %(netbsd_link_spec)" > >> > > >> > #define NETBSD_ENTRY_POINT "__start" > >> > >> Not sure the omission of mips64r2 was deliberate here, or in vxworks.h. > > > > Yes it was deliberate: mips64r2 was already missing from the original > ASM_SPEC > > in vxworks.h and the LINK_SPEC in netbsfd.h. > > Right, but that's what I was saying didn't look deliberate. I expect > it was just missed when mips64r2 was added.
Would you like me to update the ASM_SPEC and LINK_SPEC to include mips64r[235]? Regards, Andrew
