Andrew Bennett <andrew.benn...@imgtec.com> writes:
>> > @@ -141,7 +151,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
>> > "%{EL:-m elf32lmip} \
>> > %{EB:-m elf32bmip} \
>> > %(endian_spec) \
>> > - %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2}
>> %{mips64} \
>> > + %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2}
>> \
>> > + %{mips32r3} %{mips32r5} %{mips64} \
>> > %(netbsd_link_spec)"
>> >
>> > #define NETBSD_ENTRY_POINT "__start"
>>
>> Not sure the omission of mips64r2 was deliberate here, or in vxworks.h.
>
> Yes it was deliberate: mips64r2 was already missing from the original
> ASM_SPEC
> in vxworks.h and the LINK_SPEC in netbsfd.h.
Right, but that's what I was saying didn't look deliberate. I expect
it was just missed when mips64r2 was added.
Thanks,
Richard
