Hi, On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> IMHO TER should be improved to *do* disturb the order of the incoming > instructions, to reduce register pressure. The latter is the goal, yes. But TER isn't really the right place for that (it's constrained by too many invariants, running after coalescing and caring only for single-use SSA names e.g). So the alternative would be to have something which is designed for nothing else than reducing register pressure on gimple, and making TER not destroy such schedule. Ciao, Michael.
