On 11/27/13 04:48, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:36:18AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior
to stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping
their patch. I'd like to have a sense of everything that is
outstanding sooner rather than later and wrap up any loose ends as
quickly as possible.
On my side, there's
[c++, driver] Add -lrt on Solaris
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01488.html
resubmitted as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00412.html
It's unclear if the more intrusive solution outlined in the second
message (introduce libstdc++.spec) were acceptable in stage3, and I'm
uncertain if I can get it ready in time.
Well, the short-term hack to g++spec.c along with the corresponding
change to sol2.h is, OK for the trunk.
As for the more invasive change, I'd let the C++ runtime guys decide if
its too invasive for stage3. If you go that route, worst case is it's
considered too invasive and it goes in during stage1 and you can remove
the hack-ish solution from this patch.
jeff
