Hi David,
Please see my response below:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Edelsohn [mailto:dje....@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:44 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Richard Henderson; Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; 'Joseph S.
> Myers'; gcc-patches
> Subject: RE: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
>
> Balaji,
>
> Thanks for this new feature and I am relieved that so much of it works
> successfully on PowerLinux and AIX.
>
> I know that you have received a deluge of reports of issues with the cilkplus
> support that you slowly are working through. I am seeing the following new
> testsuite failures on AIX:
>
> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit2.c:
> In function 'main2':
> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-
> plus/AN/sec_implicit2.c:23:15:
> error: __sec_implicit_index parameter must be an integer constant expression
I have this line flagged for error using dg-error.
Here is the cut and paste of it:
=======================================================
array[:][:] = __sec_implicit_index(argc) + array[:][:]; /* { dg-error
"__sec_implicit_index parameter" } */
return 0;
================================================================
I just have a partial message inside quotes, not the whole thing. My x86_64
machine seem to accept it. I am not very familiar with deja-gnu, but does
dg-error require the complete error message?
>
> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-
> plus/AN/sec_reduce_max_min_ind.c:
> In function 'main2':
> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-
> plus/AN/sec_reduce_max_min_ind.c:23:28:
> error: __sec_reduce_min_ind or __sec_reduce_max_ind cannot have arrays
> with dimension greater than 1
> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-
> plus/AN/sec_reduce_max_min_ind.c:27:28:
> error: __sec_reduce_min_ind or __sec_reduce_max_ind cannot have arrays
> with dimension greater than 1
Same as above for this also.
>
> I hope that you can help resolve these errors.
>
> Thanks, David
