On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Iyer, Balaji V <balaji.v.i...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
>> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:52 PM
>> To: Iyer, Balaji V
>> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'gcc-patches'
>> Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
>>
>> On 05/28/2013 11:44 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>> > i Richard, Jakub et al..
>> > I think I have fixed everything requested by RTH
>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01400.html). I think I have
>> also moved the tests in the correct place Jakub requested. It is passing all
>> the
>> correct regression tests and not affecting others.
>> >
>> > Is this patch OK for trunk?
>>
>> Yes, it's ok.
>
> This patch is committed to trunk at revision 199389.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Linux/x32, I got
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -O0 -fcilkplus execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -O0 -std=c99
execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -g -O0 -std=c99
execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -g -std=c99 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -std=c99 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -g -O0 -fcilkplus execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -g -fcilkplus execution test
[x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fcilkplus -g
-O0 -std=c99 -fcilkplus -lm -m32 -o ./if_test.exe
[x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fcilkplus -g
-O0 -std=c99 -fcilkplus -lm -mx32 -o ./if_test.exe
[x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ ./if_test.exe
[x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ echo $?
5
[x32@gnu-35 gcc]$
(gdb) r
Starting program:
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/testsuite/gcc/if_test.exe
Breakpoint 1, main2 (argc=3, argv=0xffffd240)
at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c:131
131 return 5;
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.16-30.1.fc18.x32
(gdb) p ii
$1 = 0
(gdb) p array2_check
$2 = {5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5}
(gdb) p array2
$3 = {10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10}
(gdb)
Does cilkplus assume ptr_mode == word_mode? On x32, ptr_mode == SImode
and word_mode == DImode.
--
H.J.
