On 4/1/25 8:03 AM, Kito Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:47 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/31/25 7:03 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 31, 2025, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't immediately see anything in this test or its history to
indicate it's only supposed to work for rv64.
It's the 64-bit integral argument rs1.
Right, but ISTM we ought to be able to handle a vector of 64bit integral
types, especially from the intrinsics interface.
Probably the thing to do is see what the intrinsics docs say. Or maybe
Kito knows offhand.
Long story, fortunately we have some record on that:
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/issues/9
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/issues/199
Thanks. While they don't address this issue specifically, Craig's
comments seem to indicate a desire to support the intrinsics in these
scenarios and the compiler has to deal with the 64bit integer problems
on rv32.
I don't think it changes anything for Alex, we still need to disable the
test for rv32 as the expected sequence just isn't right in that case.
jeff
