On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 5:50 AM Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:36 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > obj.found is the number of LTO symbols. We should include the offload
> > section when it is used by linker even if there are no LTO symbols.
>
> OK.
>
> > PR lto/116361
> > * lto-plugin.c (claim_file_handler_v2): Don't check obj.found
> > for the offload section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> > index 61b0de62f52..c564b36eb92 100644
> > --- a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> > +++ b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> > @@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ claim_file_handler_v2 (const struct
> > ld_plugin_input_file *file,
> > if (*can_be_claimed && !obj.offload && offload_files_last_lto == NULL)
> > offload_files_last_lto = offload_files_last;
> >
> > - if (obj.offload && known_used && obj.found > 0)
> > + if (obj.offload && known_used)
> > {
> > /* Add file to the list. The order must be exactly the same as the
> > final
> > order after recompilation and linking, otherwise host and target
> > tables
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
OK to backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a98dd536b1017c2b814a3465206c6c01b2890998
and this patch to release branches?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
