On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:36 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> obj.found is the number of LTO symbols.  We should include the offload
> section when it is used by linker even if there are no LTO symbols.

OK.

>         PR lto/116361
>         * lto-plugin.c (claim_file_handler_v2): Don't check obj.found
>         for the offload section.
>
> Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> index 61b0de62f52..c564b36eb92 100644
> --- a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> +++ b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> @@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ claim_file_handler_v2 (const struct 
> ld_plugin_input_file *file,
>    if (*can_be_claimed && !obj.offload && offload_files_last_lto == NULL)
>      offload_files_last_lto = offload_files_last;
>
> -  if (obj.offload && known_used && obj.found > 0)
> +  if (obj.offload && known_used)
>      {
>        /* Add file to the list.  The order must be exactly the same as the 
> final
>          order after recompilation and linking, otherwise host and target 
> tables
> --
> 2.46.0
>

Reply via email to