As said, even if we don't consider this problematic because we are used to the 
mildly complex case distinction that you just exposed over several paragraphs, 
it doesn't mean that we should do it, nor does it mean that it would be 
beneficial for our users or for other implementations that would like to 
follow. 

And also as said, all other features in the standard, being types, typeof, or 
expressions, e.g offsetof, unreachable or other gnu extensions,  don't have nor 
need this kind of syntax.

We should be designing features for the future, not the past

Jens
-- 
Jens Gustedt - INRIA & ICube, Strasbourg, France 

Reply via email to