> :-D Looks good to me. EXCEPT I think the test sample file would need a 
> change, too. I didn't see that.

Running “make check” produces the additional diff, which I’ll add to the patch 
before I push. Does it look okay?

FX




diff --git a/fixincludes/tests/base/math.h b/fixincludes/tests/base/math.h
index 7b92f29a409..3c378c5df95 100644
--- a/fixincludes/tests/base/math.h
+++ b/fixincludes/tests/base/math.h
@@ -7,12 +7,6 @@
     This had to be done to correct non-standard usages in the
     original, manufacturer supplied header file.  */
  -#ifndef FIXINC_WRAP_MATH_H_MATH_EXCEPTION
-#define FIXINC_WRAP_MATH_H_MATH_EXCEPTION 1
-
-#ifdef __cplusplus
-#define exception __math_exception
-#endif
     #if defined( BROKEN_CABS_CHECK )
@@ -146,8 +140,3 @@ int foo;
 #endif /* _C99 */
   #endif  /* VXWORKS_MATH_H_FP_C99_CHECK */
-#ifdef __cplusplus
-#undef exception
-#endif
-
-#endif  /* FIXINC_WRAP_MATH_H_MATH_EXCEPTION */

Reply via email to