No. It will need to change all patterns in vector.md.
It's a nightmare.

You should note I will refine vector.md in GCC-15, mixing theadvector things 
make me impossible to maintain
RVV1.0.



juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
 
From: Andrew Pinski
Date: 2024-01-03 11:19
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: jeffreyalaw; cooper.joshua; gcc-patches; Jim Wilson; palmer; andrew; 
philipp.tomsich; christoph.muellner; jinma; cooper.qu
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions 
of XTheadVector.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:07 PM juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
<juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> We have no choice. You should know theadvector is totally unrelated with 
> RVV1.0 standard ISA.
>
> Adding `%^' which missing totally unrelated ISA makes no sens to me.
 
No, it implements it in a different way.
Basically all of the patterns which are supported get changed to be
instead of "v*" becomes instead "%^v" and then you change
riscv_print_operand_punct_valid_p to allow '^' and then you add '^'
support to riscv_print_operand (like '~' is handled there).
 
And the next patch adds a few more '%' to support printing different
different strings based on XTheadVector or not.
 
This is how almost all other targets handle this kind of things
instead of hacking ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE .
 
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
 
 
>
> ________________________________
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
> Date: 2024-01-03 10:54
> To: 钟居哲
> CC: Jeff Law; cooper.joshua; gcc-patches; jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; 
> philipp.tomsich; Christoph Müllner; jinma; Cooper Qu
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the 
> instructions of XTheadVector.
> On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 2:59 PM 钟居哲 <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote:
> >
> > This is Ok from my side.
> > But before commit this patch, I think we need this patch first:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641533.html
> >
> > I will be back to work so I will take a look at other patches today.
>
>
> Note I hate it. It would be better if you use something like `%^' (see
> `~` for an example of how that works) instead of hacking
> riscv_asm_output_opcode really. In fact that is how other targets
> implement this kind of things.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew PInski
>
> > ________________________________
> > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> >
> >
> > From: Jeff Law
> > Date: 2024-01-01 01:43
> > To: Jun Sha (Joshua); gcc-patches
> > CC: jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; christoph.muellner; 
> > juzhe.zhong; Jin Ma; Xianmiao Qu
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions 
> > of XTheadVector.
> >
> >
> > On 12/28/23 21:19, Jun Sha (Joshua) wrote:
> > > This patch adds th. prefix to all XTheadVector instructions by
> > > implementing new assembly output functions. We only check the
> > > prefix is 'v', so that no extra attribute is needed.
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (riscv_asm_output_opcode):
> > > New function to add assembler insn code prefix/suffix.
> > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_asm_output_opcode): Likewise.
> > > * config/riscv/riscv.h (ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE): Likewise.
> > >
> > > Co-authored-by: Jin Ma <ji...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Co-authored-by: Xianmiao Qu <cooper...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Co-authored-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
> > > ---
> > >   gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h                    |  1 +
> > >   gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                          | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >   gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h                           |  4 ++++
> > >   .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/prefix.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >   4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 
> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/prefix.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h 
> > > b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > > index 31049ef7523..5ea54b45703 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct riscv_address_info {
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /* Routines implemented in riscv.cc.  */
> > > +extern const char *riscv_asm_output_opcode (FILE *asm_out_file, const 
> > > char *p);
> > >   extern enum riscv_symbol_type riscv_classify_symbolic_expression (rtx);
> > >   extern bool riscv_symbolic_constant_p (rtx, enum riscv_symbol_type *);
> > >   extern int riscv_float_const_rtx_index_for_fli (rtx);
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > > index 0d1cbc5cb5f..ea1d59d9cf2 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > > @@ -5636,6 +5636,20 @@ riscv_get_v_regno_alignment (machine_mode mode)
> > >     return lmul;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +/* Define ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE to do anything special before
> > > +   emitting an opcode.  */
> > > +const char *
> > > +riscv_asm_output_opcode (FILE *asm_out_file, const char *p)
> > > +{
> > > +  /* We need to add th. prefix to all the xtheadvector
> > > +     insturctions here.*/
> > > +  if (TARGET_XTHEADVECTOR && current_output_insn != NULL_RTX &&
> > > +      p[0] == 'v')
> > > +    fputs ("th.", asm_out_file);
> > > +
> > > +  return p;
> > Just a formatting nit. The GNU standards break lines before the
> > operator, not after.  So
> >    if (TARGET_XTHEADVECTOR
> >        && current_output_insn != NULL
> >        && p[0] == 'v')
> >
> > Note that current_output_insn is "extern rtx_insn *", so use NULL, not
> > NULL_RTX.
> >
> > Neither of these nits require a new version for review.  Just fix them.
> >
> > If Juzhe is fine with this, so am I.  We can refine it if necessary later.
> >
> > jeff
> >
>
 

Reply via email to