It depends on the timing when you send out the v1 patch to the mailing list, not the timing of when to merge, but of course it's case by case, I would say no IF it's still not ready when time is the end of Feb for this kind of big patch set.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:17 AM joshua <cooper.jos...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > Hi Kito, > > Thank you for your support. > So even during stage 4, we can merge this for GCC 14? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 发件人：Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> > 发送时间：2024年1月8日(星期一) 11:06 > 收件人：joshua<cooper.jos...@linux.alibaba.com> > 抄 送："juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai"<juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; > jeffreyalaw<jeffreya...@gmail.com>; "gcc-patches"<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; > Jim Wilson<jim.wilson....@gmail.com>; palmer<pal...@dabbelt.com>; > andrew<and...@sifive.com>; "philipp.tomsich"<philipp.toms...@vrull.eu>; > "christoph.muellner"<christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>; > jinma<ji...@linux.alibaba.com>; "cooper.qu"<cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> > 主 题：Re: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions of > XTheadVector. > > > I am ok with merging this for GCC 14, as we discussed several times in > the RISC-V GCC sync up meeting, I think at least we reach consensus > among Jeff Law, Palmer Dabbelt and me. > > But please be careful: don't break anything for standard vector stuff. > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:11 AM joshua <cooper.jos...@linux.alibaba.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Juzhe, > > > > Stage 3 will close today and there are still some patches that > > haven't been reviewed left. > > So is it possible to get xtheadvector merged in GCC-14? > > We emailed Kito regarding this, but haven't got any reply yet. > > > > Joshua > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 发件人：juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> > > 发送时间：2024年1月4日(星期四) 17:18 > > 收件人："cooper.joshua"<cooper.jos...@linux.alibaba.com>; > > jeffreyalaw<jeffreya...@gmail.com>; "gcc-patches"<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> > > 抄 送：Jim Wilson<jim.wilson....@gmail.com>; palmer<pal...@dabbelt.com>; > > andrew<and...@sifive.com>; "philipp.tomsich"<philipp.toms...@vrull.eu>; > > "christoph.muellner"<christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>; > > jinma<ji...@linux.alibaba.com>; "cooper.qu"<cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> > > 主 题：Re: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions > > of XTheadVector. > > > > > > \ No newline at end of file > > Each file needs newline. > > > > > > I am not able to review arch stuff. This needs kito. > > > > > > Besides, Andrew Pinski want us defer theadvector to GCC-15. > > > > > > I have no strong opinion here. > > > > > > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai > > > > > > 发件人： joshua > > 发送时间： 2024-01-04 17:15 > > 收件人： 钟居哲; Jeff Law; gcc-patches > > 抄送： jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; Christoph Müllner; > > jinma; Cooper Qu > > 主题： Re：Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions of > > XTheadVector. > > > > Hi Juzhe, > > > > So is the following patch that this patch relies on OK to commit? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641533.html > > > > Joshua > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 发件人：钟居哲 <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> > > 发送时间：2024年1月2日(星期二) 06:57 > > 收件人：Jeff Law<jeffreya...@gmail.com>; > > "cooper.joshua"<cooper.jos...@linux.alibaba.com>; > > "gcc-patches"<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> > > 抄 送："jim.wilson.gcc"<jim.wilson....@gmail.com>; palmer<pal...@dabbelt.com>; > > andrew<and...@sifive.com>; "philipp.tomsich"<philipp.toms...@vrull.eu>; > > "Christoph Müllner"<christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>; > > jinma<ji...@linux.alibaba.com>; Cooper Qu<cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> > > 主 题：Re: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions > > of XTheadVector. > > > > > > This is Ok from my side. > > But before commit this patch, I think we need this patch first: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641533.html > > > > > > I will be back to work so I will take a look at other patches today. > > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai > > > > > > From: Jeff Law > > Date: 2024-01-01 01:43 > > To: Jun Sha (Joshua); gcc-patches > > CC: jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; christoph.muellner; > > juzhe.zhong; Jin Ma; Xianmiao Qu > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] RISC-V: Adds the prefix "th." for the instructions > > of XTheadVector. > > > > > > > > On 12/28/23 21:19, Jun Sha (Joshua) wrote: > > > This patch adds th. prefix to all XTheadVector instructions by > > > implementing new assembly output functions. We only check the > > > prefix is 'v', so that no extra attribute is needed. > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (riscv_asm_output_opcode): > > > New function to add assembler insn code prefix/suffix. > > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_asm_output_opcode): Likewise. > > > * config/riscv/riscv.h (ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE): Likewise. > > > > > > Co-authored-by: Jin Ma <ji...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Co-authored-by: Xianmiao Qu <cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Co-authored-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu> > > > --- > > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h | 1 + > > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h | 4 ++++ > > > .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/prefix.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/prefix.c > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h > > > b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h > > > index 31049ef7523..5ea54b45703 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h > > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h > > > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct riscv_address_info { > > > }; > > > > > > /* Routines implemented in riscv.cc. */ > > > +extern const char *riscv_asm_output_opcode (FILE *asm_out_file, const > > > char *p); > > > extern enum riscv_symbol_type riscv_classify_symbolic_expression (rtx); > > > extern bool riscv_symbolic_constant_p (rtx, enum riscv_symbol_type *); > > > extern int riscv_float_const_rtx_index_for_fli (rtx); > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > > index 0d1cbc5cb5f..ea1d59d9cf2 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > > @@ -5636,6 +5636,20 @@ riscv_get_v_regno_alignment (machine_mode mode) > > > return lmul; > > > } > > > > > > +/* Define ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE to do anything special before > > > + emitting an opcode. */ > > > +const char * > > > +riscv_asm_output_opcode (FILE *asm_out_file, const char *p) > > > +{ > > > + /* We need to add th. prefix to all the xtheadvector > > > + insturctions here.*/ > > > + if (TARGET_XTHEADVECTOR && current_output_insn != NULL_RTX && > > > + p[0] == 'v') > > > + fputs ("th.", asm_out_file); > > > + > > > + return p; > > Just a formatting nit. The GNU standards break lines before the > > operator, not after. So > > if (TARGET_XTHEADVECTOR > > && current_output_insn != NULL > > && p[0] == 'v') > > > > Note that current_output_insn is "extern rtx_insn *", so use NULL, not > > NULL_RTX. > > > > Neither of these nits require a new version for review. Just fix them. > > > > If Juzhe is fine with this, so am I. We can refine it if necessary later. > > > > jeff > > > > > > > > > >
