Hi Folks

> On 30 Oct 2023, at 16:31, FX Coudert <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +enable_darwin_at_rpath_$1=no
> 
> I actually don’t understand why this one would have $1 in the name, unlike 
> all other regenerated configure files. What value do we expect for $1 at this 
> point in the file? That’s just plain weird.

I’ve committed the missing hunk - at least that should appease CI.

Agreed, it is weird, (actually, I’ve never quite understood why fixincludes 
wants libtool.m4 given that it is host-side and not building any libraries) ..

Iain

Reply via email to