> I don't understand why it is necessary to bother "VF". "VF” should > not be changed since intrinsic stuff is quite stable and any > unreasonable changes are unacceptable.
Ok, I hear your concern. My argument is: Currently our mechanism of disabling instructions is incorrect and if any of the VF instructions were to be created by combine, fwprop or other passes we'd potentially ICE in reload. The other option is to leave VF unchanged and duplicate all patterns for VHF. Those can have a TARGET_ZVFH then. > vle/vse/vluxei/vloxei/vsuxei/vsoxei/vlse/vsse. These are all V/VT and not VF? (apart from vlse which I adjusted) Regards Robin
