Hi Philipp:
This testcase got wrong result with this patch even w/o
<bitmanip_optab>si3_sext pattern:
#include <stdio.h>
#define MAX(A, B) ((A) > (B) ? (A) : (B))
long long __attribute__((noinline, noipa))
foo6(long long a, long long b, int c)
{
int xa = a;
int xb = b;
return MAX(MAX(xa, xb), c);
}
int main() {
long long a = 0x200000000ll;
long long b = 0x1ffffffffl;
int c = 10;
long long d = foo6(a, b, c);
printf ("%lld %lld %d = %lld\n", a, b, c, d);
return 0;
}
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:27 AM Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> IIRC it's not work even without sign extend pattern since I did similar
> experimental before (not for RISC-V, but same concept), I guess I need more
> time to test that.
>
> Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu> 於 2021年11月12日 週五 00:18 寫道：
>>
>> Kito,
>>
>> Unless I am missing something, the problem is not the relaxation to
>> GPR, but rather the sign-extending pattern I had squashed into the
>> same patch.
>> If you disable "<bitmanip_optab>si3_sext", a sext.w will be have to be
>> emitted after the 'max' and before the return (or before the SImode
>> output is consumed as a DImode), pushing the REE opportunity to a
>> subsequent consumer (e.g. an addw).
>>
>> This will generate
>> foo6:
>> max a0,a0,a1
>> sext.w a0,a0
>> ret
>> which (assuming that the inputs to max are properly sign-extended
>> SImode values living in DImode registers) will be the same as
>> performing the two sext.w before the max.
>>
>> Having a second set of eyes on this is appreciated — let me know if
>> you agree and I'll revise, once I have collected feedback on the
>> remaining patches of the series.
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 17:00, Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Philipp:
>> >
>> > We can't pretend we have SImode min/max instruction without that semantic.
>> > Give this testcase, x86 and rv64gc print out 8589934592 8589934591 = 0,
>> > but with this patch and compile with rv64gc_zba_zbb -O3, the output
>> > become 8589934592 8589934591 = 8589934592
>> >
>> > -------------Testcase---------------
>> > #include <stdio.h>
>> > long long __attribute__((noinline, noipa))
>> > foo6(long long a, long long b)
>> > {
>> > int xa = a;
>> > int xb = b;
>> > return (xa > xb ? xa : xb);
>> > }
>> > int main() {
>> > long long a = 0x200000000ll;
>> > long long b = 0x1ffffffffl;
>> > long long c = foo6(a, b);
>> > printf ("%lld %lld = %lld\n", a, b, c);
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > v64gc_zba_zbb -O3 w/o this patch:
>> > foo6:
>> > sext.w a1,a1
>> > sext.w a0,a0
>> > max a0,a0,a1
>> > ret
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > v64gc_zba_zbb -O3 w/ this patch:
>> > foo6:
>> > max a0,a0,a1
>> > ret
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:10 PM Philipp Tomsich
>> > <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > While min/minu/max/maxu instructions are provided for XLEN only, these
>> > > can safely operate on GPRs (i.e. SImode or DImode for RV64): SImode is
>> > > always sign-extended, which ensures that the XLEN-wide instructions
>> > > can be used for signed and unsigned comparisons on SImode yielding a
>> > > correct ordering of value.
>> > >
>> > > This commit
>> > > - relaxes the minmax pattern to express for GPR (instead of X only),
>> > > providing both a si3 and di3 expansion on RV64
>> > > - adds a sign-extending form for thee si3 pattern for RV64 to all REE
>> > > to eliminate redundant extensions
>> > > - adds test-cases for both
>> > >
>> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
>> > >
>> > > * config/riscv/bitmanip.md: Relax minmax to GPR (i.e SImode or
>> > > DImode) on RV64.
>> > > * config/riscv/bitmanip.md (<bitmanip_optab>si3_sext): Add
>> > > pattern for REE.
>> > >
>> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> > >
>> > > * gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c: Add testcases for SImode
>> > > operands checking that no redundant sign- or zero-extensions
>> > > are emitted.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu>
>> > > ---
>> > >
>> > > gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md | 14 +++++++++++---
>> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>> > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
>> > > index 000deb48b16..2a28f78f5f6 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
>> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
>> > > @@ -260,13 +260,21 @@ (define_insn "bswap<mode>2"
>> > > [(set_attr "type" "bitmanip")])
>> > >
>> > > (define_insn "<bitmanip_optab><mode>3"
>> > > - [(set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>> > > - (bitmanip_minmax:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" "r")
>> > > - (match_operand:X 2 "register_operand" "r")))]
>> > > + [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>> > > + (bitmanip_minmax:GPR (match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand"
>> > > "r")
>> > > + (match_operand:GPR 2 "register_operand"
>> > > "r")))]
>> > > "TARGET_ZBB"
>> > > "<bitmanip_insn>\t%0,%1,%2"
>> > > [(set_attr "type" "bitmanip")])
>> > >
>> > > +(define_insn "<bitmanip_optab>si3_sext"
>> > > + [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>> > > + (sign_extend:DI (bitmanip_minmax:SI (match_operand:SI 1
>> > > "register_operand" "r")
>> > > + (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand"
>> > > "r"))))]
>> > > + "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_ZBB"
>> > > + "<bitmanip_insn>\t%0,%1,%2"
>> > > + [(set_attr "type" "bitmanip")])
>> > > +
>> > > ;; orc.b (or-combine) is added as an unspec for the benefit of the
>> > > support
>> > > ;; for optimized string functions (such as strcmp).
>> > > (define_insn "orcb<mode>2"
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c
>> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c
>> > > index f44c398ea08..7169e873551 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-min-max.c
>> > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> > > /* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > -/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zbb -mabi=lp64 -O2" } */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zba_zbb -mabi=lp64 -O2" } */
>> > >
>> > > long
>> > > foo1 (long i, long j)
>> > > @@ -25,7 +25,21 @@ foo4 (unsigned long i, unsigned long j)
>> > > return i > j ? i : j;
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > +unsigned int
>> > > +foo5(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
>> > > +{
>> > > + return a > b ? a : b;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +int
>> > > +foo6(int a, int b)
>> > > +{
>> > > + return a > b ? a : b;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "min" 3 } } */
>> > > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "max" 3 } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "max" 4 } } */
>> > > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "minu" 1 } } */
>> > > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "maxu" 1 } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "maxu" 3 } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "zext.w" } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "sext.w" } } */
>> > > --
>> > > 2.32.0
>> > >
