On 01/27/2012 05:53 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Paolo Carlini<paolo.carl...@oracle.com> writes:
On 01/27/2012 05:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
... even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (CentOS 5.6), I see additions to
3.4.11 (at least beyond the current baselines).
Sure there are additions at 3.4.11, regularly explicitly exported
@3.4.11 in the linker script. Everything went as planned, I repeat. The
baselines are old, are always old, didn't we discuss that already?
That's not the issue here: those additions are symbols that were added
recently, it seems, way after 3.4.11 was released.
I fiddled a bit with svn blame and I have been able to find only two
changes to those lines, svn versions 135007 and 139943. At that time for
sure the linker script did *not* have a 3.4.12 open, thus in any case
can't possibly be *way after*. If you can find evidence that we did that
when a 3.4.11 was already out, then we (me; Chris Fairles via Benjamin)
did something badly wrong. But I seriously doubt that, because 3.4.11
appeared for the first time in gcc4.4.0 which was released 2009-04-21,
thus many months after those commits.
Paolo.
