Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> writes:
> On 01/27/2012 05:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> ... even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (CentOS 5.6), I see additions to
>> 3.4.11 (at least beyond the current baselines).
> Sure there are additions at 3.4.11, regularly explicitly exported
> @3.4.11 in the linker script. Everything went as planned, I repeat. The
> baselines are old, are always old, didn't we discuss that already?
That's not the issue here: those additions are symbols that were added
recently, it seems, way after 3.4.11 was released. If this is `as
planned', I give up on libstdc++.so symbol versioning since it servers
no useful purpose.
I fear this is another case of the version maps using wildcards that are
way too permissive.
> Normally, Jakub from time to time takes care of moving forward the
> baselines, if you are interested in the baselines specifically, you
> should ask him.
Hopefully he can clarify.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
