On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:54:56PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> writes:
>
> > On 01/27/2012 05:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> I'd even argue that abi_check should flag all additions to released
> >> versions as a hard error.
> > Again, agreed. As a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure we do that already, I'm
> > pretty sure Benjamin tightened abi_check in the light of that problem we
> > had in 2005.
>
> I doubt that, otherwise the additions to versions already released
> should have been flagged as such on Solaris, but abi_check suggests they
> are benign.
If you mean
TLS:8:_ZSt11__once_call@@GLIBCXX_3.4.11
TLS:8:_ZSt15__once_callable@@GLIBCXX_3.4.11
then those symbols were really added in 3.4.11, but I haven't added them
(intentionally) to the baseline symbols, since then anybody configuring
without working TLS would get hard make check failures.
Jakub
