Hi Andrea,

On 2/19/20 1:01 PM, Andrea Corallo wrote:
Hi all,

Second version of the patch here addressing comments.

This patch enables the Armv8.1-M Mainline LOB (low overhead branch) extension
low overhead loops (LOL) feature by using the 'loop-doloop' pass.

Given the following function:

void
loop (int *a)
{
  for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
    a[i] = i;
}

'doloop_begin' and 'doloop_end' patterns translates into 'dls' and 'le'
giving:

 loop:
         movw    r2, #10000
         movs    r3, #0
         subs    r0, r0, #4
         push    {lr}
         dls     lr, r2
 .L2:
         str     r3, [r0, #4]!
         adds    r3, r3, #1
         le      lr, .L2
         ldr     pc, [sp], #4

SMS is disabled in tests not to break them when SMS does loop versioning.

bootstrapped arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, do not introduce testsuite regressions.


This should be aimed at GCC 11 at this point.

Some comments inline...



Andrea

gcc/ChangeLog:

2020-??-??  Andrea Corallo  <andrea.cora...@arm.com>
            Mihail-Calin Ionescu <mihail.ione...@arm.com>
            Iain Apreotesei  <iain.apreote...@arm.com>

        * config/arm/arm.c (TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP):
        (arm_invalid_within_doloop): Implement invalid_within_doloop hook.
        * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_LOB): Add new macro.
        * config/arm/thumb2.md (*doloop_end, doloop_begin, dls_insn):
        Add new patterns.
        * config/arm/unspecs.md: Add new unspec.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-??-??  Andrea Corallo  <andrea.cora...@arm.com>
            Mihail-Calin Ionescu <mihail.ione...@arm.com>
            Iain Apreotesei  <iain.apreote...@arm.com>

        * gcc.target/arm/lob.h: New header.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob1.c: New testcase.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob2.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob4.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob5.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob6.c: Likewise.


lol.patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
index e07cf03538c5..1269f40bd77c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
@@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ extern int arm_arch_bf16;
/* Target machine storage Layout. */ +/* Nonzero if this chip provides Armv8.1-M Mainline
+   LOB (low overhead branch features) extension instructions.  */
+#define TARGET_HAVE_LOB (arm_arch8_1m_main)
/* Define this macro if it is advisable to hold scalars in registers
    in a wider mode than that declared by the program.  In such cases,
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 9cc7bc0e5621..7c2a7b7e9e97 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ static const struct attribute_spec arm_attribute_table[] =
 #undef TARGET_CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT
 #define TARGET_CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT arm_constant_alignment
+#undef TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP
+#define TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP arm_invalid_within_doloop
+
 #undef TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST
 #define TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST arm_md_asm_adjust
@@ -32937,6 +32940,27 @@ arm_ge_bits_access (void)
   return true;
 }
+/* NULL if INSN insn is valid within a low-overhead loop.
+   Otherwise return why doloop cannot be applied.  */
+
+static const char *
+arm_invalid_within_doloop (const rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+  if (!TARGET_HAVE_LOB)
+    return default_invalid_within_doloop (insn);
+
+  if (CALL_P (insn))
+    return "Function call in the loop.";
+
+  if (tablejump_p (insn, NULL, NULL) || computed_jump_p (insn))
+    return "Computed branch in the loop.";
+
+  if (reg_mentioned_p (gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM), insn))
+    return "LR is used inside loop.";
+
+  return NULL;
+}
+
 #if CHECKING_P
 namespace selftest {
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
index b0d3bd1cf1c4..4aff1a0838d8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
@@ -1555,8 +1555,11 @@
       using a certain 'count' register and (2) the loop count can be
       adjusted by modifying this register prior to the loop.
       ??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize the
-      new IV can potentially affect branch optimizations.  */
-   if (optimize > 0 && flag_modulo_sched)
+      new IV can potentially affect branch optimizations.
+
+      Also used to implement the low over head loops feature, which is part of
+      the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low Overhead Branch (LOB) extension.  */
+   if (optimize > 0 && (flag_modulo_sched || TARGET_HAVE_LOB))
    {
      rtx s0;
      rtx bcomp;
@@ -1569,6 +1572,11 @@
        FAIL;
s0 = operands [0];
+
+     /* Low over head loop instructions require the first operand to be LR.  */
+     if (TARGET_HAVE_LOB)
+       s0 = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM);
+
      if (TARGET_THUMB2)
        insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
      else
@@ -1650,3 +1658,30 @@
   "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
   "lsrl%?\\t%Q0, %R0, %1"
   [(set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
+
+;; Originally expanded by 'doloop_end'.
+(define_insn "doloop_end_internal"

We usually prefer to name these patterns with a '*' in front to prevent the 
gen* machinery from generating gen_* unneeded expanders for them if they're not 
used.


+  [(parallel [(set (pc)
+                   (if_then_else
+                       (ne (reg:SI LR_REGNUM) (const_int 1))
+                     (label_ref (match_operand 0 "" ""))
+                     (pc)))
+              (set (reg:SI LR_REGNUM)
+                   (plus:SI (reg:SI LR_REGNUM) (const_int -1)))])]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  "le\t%|lr, %l0")
+
+(define_expand "doloop_begin"
+  [(match_operand 0 "" "")
+   (match_operand 1 "" "")]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  {
+    emit_insn (gen_dls_insn (operands[0]));
+    DONE;
+  })
+
+(define_insn "dls_insn"
+  [(set (reg:SI LR_REGNUM)
+        (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "r")] 
UNSPEC_DLS))]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  "dls\t%|lr, %0")
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
index 8f4a705f43ef..df5ecb731925 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
   UNSPEC_SMUADX                ; Represent the SMUADX operation.
   UNSPEC_SSAT16                ; Represent the SSAT16 operation.
   UNSPEC_USAT16                ; Represent the USAT16 operation.
+  UNSPEC_DLS           ; Used for DLS (Do Loop Start), Armv8.1-M Mainline 
instruction
 ])
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..feaae7cc8995
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+#include <string.h>
+
+/* Common code for lob tests.  */
+
+#define NO_LOB asm volatile ("@ clobber lr" : : : "lr" )
+
+#define N 10000
+
+static void
+reset_data (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  memset (a, -1, N * sizeof (*a));
+  memset (b, -1, N * sizeof (*b));
+  memset (c, -1, N * sizeof (*c));
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4913519942f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   for some simple loops.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */


We need to avoid running this test on targets that don't support LOB. This 
needs an appropriate effective target check (see the existing *_hw ones in 
lib/target-supports.exp)

Thanks,
Kyrill

+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+    }
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  int i = 0;
+  while (i < N)
+    {
+      a[i] = i - 2;
+      b[i] = i * 5;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+      i++;
+    }
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop3 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  int i = 0;
+  do
+    {
+      a[i] = i - 4;
+      b[i] = i * 3;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+      i++;
+    } while (i < N);
+}
+
+void
+check (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      NO_LOB;
+      if (c[i] != a[i] + b[i])
+       abort ();
+    }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop1 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop2 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop3 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {le\slr,\s\S*} 3 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e81286694804
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if a non-inlineable function call takes place inside the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int __attribute__ ((noinline))
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = foo (a[i], b[i]);
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..69d22b2f023a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if causes VFP emulation library calls to happen inside the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+double a[N];
+double b[N];
+double c[N];
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..62be52e31007
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if LR is modified within the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+static __attribute__ ((always_inline)) inline int
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  NO_LOB;
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = foo(a[i], b[i]);
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad8a1b961e40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop
+   instructions.  Innermost loop has no fixed number of iterations
+   therefore is not optimizable.  Outer loops are not optimized.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+
+      int k = b[i];
+      while (k != 0)
+       {
+         if (k % 2 == 0)
+           c[i - 1] = k % 2;
+         k /= 2;
+       }
+      c[i] = a[i] - b[i];
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1dbcaff1670d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   with some less trivial loops and the result is correct.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
"-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not run SMS to prevent loop versioning" { *-*-* } { 
"-fmodulo-sched" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+#define TEST_CODE1                             \
+  {                                            \
+    for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)                     \
+      {                                                \
+       a[i] = i;                               \
+       b[i] = i * 2;                           \
+                                               \
+       for (int k = 0; k < N; k++)          \
+         {                                     \
+           MAYBE_LOB;                          \
+           c[k] = k / 2;                       \
+         }                                     \
+       c[i] = a[i] - b[i];                     \
+      }                                                \
+  }
+
+#define TEST_CODE2                             \
+  {                                            \
+    for (int i = 0; i < N / 2; i++)         \
+      {                                                \
+       MAYBE_LOB;                              \
+       if (c[i] % 2 == 0)                      \
+         break;                                \
+       a[i]++;                                 \
+       b[i]++;                                 \
+      }                                                \
+  }
+
+int a1[N];
+int b1[N];
+int c1[N];
+
+int a2[N];
+int b2[N];
+int c2[N];
+
+#define MAYBE_LOB
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE1;
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE2;
+
+#undef MAYBE_LOB
+#define MAYBE_LOB NO_LOB
+
+void
+ref1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE1;
+
+void
+ref2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE2;
+
+void
+check (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      NO_LOB;
+      if (a1[i] != a2[i]
+         && b1[i] != b2[i]
+         && c1[i] != c2[i])
+       abort ();
+    }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
+  reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+  loop1 (a1, b1, c1);
+  ref1 (a2, b2, c2);
+  check ();
+
+  reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
+  reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+  loop2 (a1, b1, c1);
+  ref2 (a2, b2, c2);
+  check ();
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {le\slr,\s\S*} 2 } } */

Reply via email to