On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > Do we really need a commit integer numbers after the transition? I know > we're used to it. > But git commit hash provides that same.
Revision numbers are nice short text strings, and from a revision number you can see approximately when it happened, and from two revision numbers on the same branch you can trivially tell which one is older. Those are nice features. But we can live without it, IMO. Segher