On 5/17/19 12:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16/05/19 13:07 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 5/16/19 12:36 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:41 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov >>> <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On May 16, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 5/15/19 5:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For the official converted repo do we really want all (old) >>>>>> development branches to be in the >>>>>> main git repo? I suppose we could create a readonly git from the >>>>>> state of the whole repository >>>>>> at the point of conversion (and also keep the SVN in readonly mode), >>>>>> just to make migration >>>>>> of content we want easy in the future? >>>>> I've always assumed we'd keep the old SVN tree read-only for historical >>>>> purposes. I strongly suspect that, ignoring release branches, that >>>>> non-active branches just aren't terribly interesting. >>>> >>>> Let's avoid mixing the two discussions: (1) converting svn repo to git >>>> (and getting community consensus to switch to git) and (2) deciding on >>>> which branches to keep in the new repo. >>>> >>> >>> I'm hoping that there is still community consensus to switch to git. >>> >>> Personally speaking, a +1 to switch to git. >> Absolutely +1 for converting as well. > > Yes please! > > Thanks for working on this, Maxim. > >
I fully support that and thank you Maxim for working on that! Martin
