On 5/17/19 1:06 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > That repository > represents what I consider the collaboratively built consensus on such > things as the desired author map (including handling of the ambiguous > author name), which directories represent branches and tags, and what tags > should be kept or removed - but building up such a consensus and keeping
About the map. I agree with Richard that we should do best approach and not to fully reconstruct history of people who has switched email address multi times. I cloned git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git and made a clean up: - for logins with duplicite emails I chose the latest one used on gcc-patches mailing list - comments were removed - a few entries contained timezone and I stripped that Final version of the map can be seen here: https://github.com/marxin/gcc-git-conversion/blob/cleanup/gcc.map @Maxim: would it be possible to update your script so that it will use: --authors-file=gcc.map ? Is it desired for the transition to use the author map? Do we want it? Martin
