On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:54:15PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > The calls into spellcheck.h are minimal and look reasonable (I can't > really comment on the x86 aspects). So I have little to add beyond the > cleanups that Manu already observed. > > One thing: shouldn't this have testcases that give test coverage for > emitting hints for -march and -mtune? Something like > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-options-11.c > (though obviously the new ones would be target-specific).
I guess I could add one, but would prefer not to list all the CPUs, just perhaps few first ones, because otherwise whenever a new CPU is added we'll need to adjust the testcase. Jakub