On 10/28/2015 07:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2015 02:10 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
So I'll ask again, why did you commit a patch which you clearly knew did
not
meet the conditions Bernd set forth for approval?
I believed that aarch64 backend didn't properly handle -fno-plt,
which shouldn't block my patch.
This really isn't how the rules work, and you've been around long enough to
know it.
Sometimes It seems that it is the only way to get attention from the
community. BTW, my patch was submitted in August.
Again, speaking strictly for myself.
--
That's unacceptable behaviour on your part. It doesn't matter if your
patch was submitted 25+ years ago, yesterday or somewhere in between.
Other folks ping, wait and find a way to work with the reviewers. Your
solution was to violate the basic rules set for for commit privileges.
What makes you special that allows you to break the rules?
In my mind that kind of behaviour is anti-social and can't be tolerated
in this community.
--
jeff
