On 29/10/15 01:47, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 02:14 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/29/2015 02:10 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'll ask again, why did you commit a patch which you clearly knew >>>>>> did >>>>>> not >>>>>> meet the conditions Bernd set forth for approval? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I believed that aarch64 backend didn't properly handle -fno-plt, >>>>> which shouldn't block my patch. >> >> >> Actually this is even worse than I thought because it sounds like you're >> saying you knowingly checked something in while being aware it would break >> another port. >> > > Only when -fno-plt was used.
So, that's a target independent feature in GCC ! So, I don't see how that justifies the commit. >> >> Sometimes It seems that it is the only way to get attention from the >> community. BTW, my patch was submitted in August. >> I personally do *not* understand how that is an excuse. regards Ramana
