On 10/29/2015 02:14 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2015 02:10 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
So I'll ask again, why did you commit a patch which you clearly knew did
not
meet the conditions Bernd set forth for approval?
I believed that aarch64 backend didn't properly handle -fno-plt,
which shouldn't block my patch.
Actually this is even worse than I thought because it sounds like you're
saying you knowingly checked something in while being aware it would
break another port.
This really isn't how the rules work, and you've been around long enough to
know it.
Sometimes It seems that it is the only way to get attention from the
community. BTW, my patch was submitted in August.
At the point where you committed the patch you already had attention and
the patch was being discussed.
Bernd
