On 14/10/15 20:17, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 14 October 2015 at 20:00, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Then until that happens I think we should disable asan and tsan for >>> AARCH64 for GCC. >> >> I can't comment on that, but we'll continue running the tests on our >> side on both 39 and 42 VMA configurations, to make sure we don't >> regress until we actually ready to go for a final solution. > > It does not work for any standard Linux distros if they support dual > node ThunderX at all. It is completely broken and does not even make > sense to do regression testing on a broken library. >
Everyone's agreed that there needs to be a clean solution for this. If the upstream for asan and tsan have it supported, I fail to see how it makes sense for GCC to be different. regards Ramana
