On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 14 October 2015 at 20:00, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Then until that happens I think we should disable asan and tsan for >> AARCH64 for GCC. > > I can't comment on that, but we'll continue running the tests on our > side on both 39 and 42 VMA configurations, to make sure we don't > regress until we actually ready to go for a final solution.
It does not work for any standard Linux distros if they support dual node ThunderX at all. It is completely broken and does not even make sense to do regression testing on a broken library. > > For the people that weren't directly involved (or don't want to be), > we'll be letting you know when a final solution is agreed and > validated between all parties. > > cheers, > --renato
