On 16 January 2015 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:

>> OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or
>> introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32.
>
> This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin
> when the input is -NaN.
> It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result
> should the same as on aarch32.
> I haven't had time to look at it in more details though.
> So, not OK?

They should have the same behaviour in aarch32 and aarch64. Did you
test on HW or a model?

/Marcus

Reply via email to