On 16 January 2015 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or >> introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32. > > This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin > when the input is -NaN. > It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result > should the same as on aarch32. > I haven't had time to look at it in more details though. > So, not OK? They should have the same behaviour in aarch32 and aarch64. Did you test on HW or a model? /Marcus
