On 16 January 2015 at 18:14, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 January 2015 at 16:21, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> My existing tests only cover armv7 so far. >> I do plan to expand them once they are all in GCC. >> >>> Otherwise, they look good to me(but I can't approve it). >>> >>> Tejas. >>> > > OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or > introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32.
This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin when the input is -NaN. It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result should the same as on aarch32. I haven't had time to look at it in more details though. So, not OK? > /Marcus
