On 07/09/2011 06:30 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> This appears to do the right thing. I didn't bother with >> markers for unwind info, since pdp11 is limited to a.out >> and thus will never use dwarf2. >> >> There are improvements that could be made. I added some >> comments to that effect but did not otherwise change the >> code generation. >> >> Note that the existence of the epilogue and return patterns >> will by themselves cause changes. In particular, basic block >> re-ordering will likely move the epilogue into the middle of >> the function, placing unlikely code paths later; something >> that was not possible with a text-based epilogue. > > Thanks, that looks good.
Committed. HAVE_prologue and HAVE_epilogue are now universally true. Yaye! r~
