-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/11 10:58, Paul Koning wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >> ... >> >>> It'd also be nice to get rid of all these big blocks of code that are >>> conditional on preprocessor macros, but I realise you're just following >>> existing practice in the surrounding code, so again it can be left to >>> a future cleanup. >> >> Yeah, this function is quite horrid - so many different paths through it. >> >> However, it looks like the only target without HAVE_prologue is actually >> pdp11, so we're carrying some unnecessary baggage for purely >> retrocomputing purposes. Paul, can you fix that? > > Sure, but... I searched for HAVE_prologue and I can't find any place that > set it. There are tests for it, but I see nothing that defines it (other > than df-scan.c which defines it as zero if it's not defined, not sure what > the point of that is). > > I must be missing something... Isn't it defined by the insn-foo generators based on the existence of a prologue/epilogue insn in the MD file?
jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFeYcAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7VGgIALj386a0t+LMKL8dqj81DnQ1 iMx7q+bMcKhJz6HT9iJNsH1u9rFuwlw5K+FqNlrlxazSUmDpnbqUbwcem33ciicl jdBQQrCCyNMI0piWNS+2VwG8D3UZYOLsgHWSONK5oBDwNwDo5P8rQ3USOh4Gv6in puKL0HsteTvycMPGoAj2ZQCs+dL6r5nogIsBMAtJ7n+Vw+hstGnbc7TdxDbWikDC 63KekXpeTyrYSBwK+mxzhs6p3lkydZxEQoh/iuKm4Pi6DFZRSZB+GTvFWSz+0Ek5 hLgqEI42LWRKx34qioO37C7cbY5ONo/O/G7wiPp3wjCm07YBFDV4awKP6XEnEfQ= =4v2Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
