On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> ...
>
>> It'd also be nice to get rid of all these big blocks of code that are
>> conditional on preprocessor macros, but I realise you're just following
>> existing practice in the surrounding code, so again it can be left to
>> a future cleanup.
>
> Yeah, this function is quite horrid - so many different paths through it.
>
> However, it looks like the only target without HAVE_prologue is actually
> pdp11, so we're carrying some unnecessary baggage for purely
> retrocomputing purposes. Paul, can you fix that?
Sure, but... I searched for HAVE_prologue and I can't find any place that set
it. There are tests for it, but I see nothing that defines it (other than
df-scan.c which defines it as zero if it's not defined, not sure what the point
of that is).
I must be missing something...
paul
