On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:05:32, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Any objections to approving it now? >> >> LGTM. > > Patch is Ok. If you could send the clang folks a heads up, I’ve love to see > them adopt the style.
Thanks, I am glad that we finally have a working solution. Checked in as https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=219367 Dmitry, would you like to use that solution also in the clang tree, instead of sleep(1) and %deflake ? Thanks Bernd.
