On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > I disagree. Busy waiting of this kind is not appropriate for the test suite,
What busy waiting, there is none in the last version of the patch? > tsan can't intercept the calls that you do through dlsym, because you > explicitly bypass tsan in that case. Ah, yes, right, I had pthread_barrier_wait on the brain, sorry. The direct use of it would be problematic. The dlopen use of it, is safe. So, that removes the objection I had to his patch. Jakub, since he has a complete solution to the problem submitted with all the test cases fixed, I think it should go in. Any objections to approving it now?
