On Jan 7, 2015, at 12:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > But I really don't like the busy waiting.
We’ve already determined that sched_sleep isn’t intercepted and can be used to non-busy wait. Any reason not to use it? > As tsan is only supported on x86_64-linux So, I hate hardening the code to be overly non-portable when it doesn’t have to be that. There is something enticing to me about the simplicity of sched_sleep.
